Was Lionel of Antwerp Poisoned?

Lionel of Antwerp was the second surviving son of Edward III, and although he died at the age of 30 and had only one child – his daughter Philippa – he is the genetic precursor to the modern English monarchy. He was the direct ancestor of kings Edward IV, Edward V, Richard III, as well as the progenitor of the Tudors, through Elizabeth of York. All the crowned heads of England from Henry VIII onward are descendants of his bloodline.

Lionel,-Duke-of-Clarence-72-Westminster-Abbey 

Lionel was HUGE; he was nearly 7 feet tall in an era where the average guy was 5’6” or thereabouts. Imagine how he would have stood out in a crowd, whether amidst courtiers or on the battlefield! To give a frame of reference, look at how the retired MBA basketball player dwarfs the average sized men near him.

imagine Lionel of Antwerp next to the average guy

Lionel wed Elizabeth de Burgh, 4th Countess of Ulster in 1352, and they appear to have had a reasonably good marriage. Elizabeth had been raised at court to be his bride since she was a little girl and she was 20 years old when they wed, so they would have known each other fairly well.

The couple’s only surviving daughter was born on 13 August 1355, and Elizabeth never bore another living child before her death in the winter of 1363.

Lionel grieved for several years, but as a royal prince could not remain unmarried indefinitely. It was thus arranged that he would marry the richly dowered daughter of the Duke of Milan, Violante Visconti.

Violante_e_Gian_Galeazzo_Visconti

Her father, Galeazzo II Visconti, had given his daughter several territories as well as a massive amount of gold and luxury goods, so the 13 year girl was a good match for the Duke of Clarence. The couple married on 28 May 1368 amid grandiose celebrations that lasted for weeks. The newlyweds were feted everywhere they went during their honeymoon trip around the bride’s dower lands. However, while they were in at Alba five months after the wedding, Lionel became violently ill. The intestinal distress was acute, and he died soon after on 7 October 1368.

Immediately rumors flew that Galeazzo had poisoned his new son-in-law. Partly this was because Lionel’s illness seems to have come as a direct result of something he ate, and it was partly because the Italians were suspected of poisoning everyone. Poisoning one’s enemies was done everywhere, but it was considered to be almost an art form among the descendants of the Roman empire. But was Lionel poisoned? Or was it just chitter-chatter based on stereotypical distrust of the Italian ruling class?

While it can certainly be said that Galeazzo had the means and opportunity to poison Lionel, what was his motive? There was no better suitor waiting in the wings. His daughter wouldn’t remarry for nearly 10 years and then it would be to a man of lower rank than the Duke of Clarence. There is no sign that Lionel was mistreating the girl, and the marriage was probably unconsummated given the bride’s tender age. Galeazzo lost much and gained nothing by the death of his daughter’s husband.

I think that Lionel probably died of either food poisoning (the naturally occurring kind) or a water born pathogen like cholera. All of Lionel’s great size and hearty athleticism would have done no good against the ravages of dehydration and shock. It would have been a painful and messy death, and would have been so short-lived and traumatic that his attendants could have easily suspected evil was behind it.

Lionel’s 13 year old daughter was now the Countess of Ulster and in line for the throne of England. She was married off in the summer of 1369 to a fellow teenager, Edmund Mortimer, 3rd Earl of March, who held important lands for Edward III in the newly-conquered Wales. She had four children who survived to adulthood, and her great-great-grandson, Edward 4th Duke of York, would become King Edward IV.

     

   

Share This:

3 thoughts on “Was Lionel of Antwerp Poisoned?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *