Saint Thomas More Was Only Human

Thomas More was born on 7 February 1478. He was one of the great European scholars of his age, and he served Henry VIII both loyally and well. More was also the reluctant Chancellor of England until being relieved of the office on March 16, 1532 due to the fact that he could not swear in good conscience that he believed Henry VIII’s first marriage was invalid.  This able academic would be beheaded by the king who once loved him as a mentor and friend not long after in July of 1534.

Thomas More by Hans_Holbein,_the_Younger

More was a polarizing figure during his lifetime, and he has been as lauded and vilified as much after his execution as before it. Some want him to truly have been the Man For All Seasons, a saint in life as well as in death, a person as perfect as the Utopia he dreamed of. Others have taken a darker view of More, repelled by rigid theology and his eagerness to burn Protestants at the stake. In some cases, such as in Hilary Mantel’s excellently written historical fiction,  More is presented as a near-incestuous and fatuous git … a worldview every bit as accurate as her depiction of Thomas Cromwell as a sweetie-pie whose only sin was being too devoted to those he loved.

In truth, Thomas More was a human being, one with moments of greatness, but a man who could hold pure ideals while simultaneously being plagued by human foibles. Thus, he was imperfect and capable of committing evil acts which he sincerely believed to be good when he performed them.

He was tragically executed for no good reason on 6 July 1535, in my opinion a victim of Henry VIII’s mental instability (either due to McLeod syndrome or chronic traumatic encephalopathy).

As could have been expected there was widespread public condemnation of More’s death, both domestically and abroad. It was pointed out that the former chancellor had never given the king an excuse to kill him, since he had never openly rebelled against Henry’s commands. Therefore, More’s beheading served only to make Henry look like a degenerate fool. If nothing else, Henry had always been profoundly concerned with his reputation, careful to behave in a manner he felt was befitting for a great king. This sudden disregard for public opinion seems to be as much of a radical departure from the King’s earlier behavior as the execution itself. Henry was fast gaining a reputation as a despot and murderer who killed anyone who disagreed with him, no matter if that person had been a confederate, or was a well-loved public figure, or was innocent of the charges brought against them. Caught up in Henry’s gory new policy of demanding blood and death, people rapidly forgot that the king had once been very different.

How do you see More? Rather more sinned against than sinning? Rather more sincere than a saint?


3 thoughts on “Saint Thomas More Was Only Human

  1. I’ve read that he was keen to give enemas to his daughter Meg. Yikes!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *