The Death of the 3rd Duke of York

Richard Plantagenet, 3rd Duke of York, was almost certainly a more rightful claimant to the throne of England than his cousin, King Henry VI. York was the descendant of King Edward III’s second son, Lionel of Antwerp, while Henry VI was the great-grandson of King Edward’s third surviving son, John of Gaunt.

Edward III to Henry VIII from york side

The Duke of York was well aware of his superior lineage. When Henry VI became mentally ill, York became king in all but name. When Henry VI had no heir after a decade of marriage, it seemed as though York, or York’s eldest son, Edward, Earl of March, would reign after Henry died. York was content to be loyal to the king under these circumstances. Henry VI had been anointed the king before God and that meant something to the people; regardless of bloodlines Henry VI was the true king in the hearts and minds of his subjects. York must trust to time to put him or his son on the throne of the mad, childless Henry VI.

Richard 3rd Duke of York

But then King Henry’s wife, Queen Margaret of Anjou, gave birth to a healthy little boy, Edward of Westminster, Prince of Wales. Now the 3rd Duke of York was no longer heir. York didn’t like that, not one little bit. There were immediate rumors that Edward of Westminster was a bastard, the whelp of Margaret’s ally and accused lover, William de la Pole, Duke of Suffolk, (dead more than two years before Edward’s conception), or her accused lover Edmund Beaufort, 2nd Duke of Somerset, or her accused lover, Beaufort’s eldest son, Henry Beaufort, 3rd Duke of Somerset, or even her accused lover, James Butler, 5th Earl of Ormond. It was AMAZING how many lovers the queen was accused of having had once she had given birth to a healthy son!

It is often said that Margaret ‘provoked’ Richard of York in some way into rebelling against his sovereign, but the historical evidence for this is sorely lacking. For years she had made very sure to be nothing but pleasant to the duke. She even remained civil to York when everyone was convinced he was behind the brutal murder of her friend and ally, William de la Pole, Duke of Suffolk, York’s rival for influence with the king. She was a foreign queen, barely out of her teens, and she couldn’t have afforded to make someone as powerful as York her open enemy, so she treated him with kid gloves.

Margaret of Anjou

Queen Margaret DID get stroppy, however, when the rumours of her son’s unroyal paternity — and other political maneuverings of York — made it clear that the king’s cousin was a threat to her son’s future. Women, silly creatures that we are, DO get a bit testy when are children are threatened. With the fate  of her child at stake, she used political know-how and alliances to move York further from the throne and curtail his power. For this, she is often blamed for ‘starting’ the Wars of the Roses, even though it is YORK who moved the fight to the battlefield when he couldn’t best the queen’s political acumen.

The first major battle of York’s rebellion was at the First Battle of St Albans on 22 May 1455. The Duke of York and his allies, Richard Neville, 16th Earl of Warwick, who would become known as the “Kingmaker”, and Richard Neville, jure uxoris 5th Earl of Salisbury. York and the Neville’s defeated the king’s army, commanded by Edmund Beaufort, 2nd Earl of Somerset, capturing King Henry and killing Somerset, Henry Percy, Earl of Northumberland and Lord Clifford. The king’s half-brother, Jasper Tudor, Earl of Pembroke, barely escaped with his life.

With the king in his grasp, York forced Queen Margaret to reinstate him as King Henry’s Lord Protector, the de facto ruler of England. York promised the other nobles that he wasn’t after the crown, and only wanted to punish and control the king’s “evil councillors”, but the queen and several members of the peerage suspected that the throne was indeed York’s ultimate goal. Edward of Westminster was only a toddler, and Queen Margaret had a strong hankering to see her son grow into adulthood and become king, therefore she started to plot against York with other nobles who had lost family members at St Albans.

On 12 October 1459 the Yorkists were defeated at the Battle of Ludford Bridge, in part because the Yorkist troops refused to fight any army headed by the king himself. Six hundred Yorkist soldiers, led by Andrew Trollope, defected to the Lancastrians rather than rebel against Henry VI. York and the Nevilles, in one of the most cowardly moves in history, told their troops they’d be right back, but instead scarpered off to the safety of Wales. Moreover, “York had abandoned not only his troops but also his wife Cecily Neville, Duchess of York, his two younger sons George and Richard and his youngest daughter Margaret.” The Lancastrian troops sacked the city, as medieval troops were want to do, but York’s wife and children were unharmed.

King Henry pardoned the abandoned troops en masse and the Lancastrians were back on top. York and his second son, Edmund, Earl of Rutland, kept running all the way to Ireland, while York’s eldest son and his Neville allies escaped to France.

Richard 3rd duke-of-york

In France, the Yorkists regrouped. They organised an invasion of England, and on 10 July 1460 they were able to take King Henry hostage once more at the Battle of Northampton.  With the king imprisoned, York then tried to get himself crowned, but he didn’t have enough support among the peerage to press for his coronation. Nonetheless, with the king again in their hands the Yorkists were able to force Henry and Queen Margaret to accept the Act of Accord on 25 October 1460, which named York as Henry’s heir rather than Edward of Westminster.

henry VI from warwick shire hall

Queen Margaret wasn’t going to stand for this, of course. She took her son and fled to Scotland, where the Queen and Regent, Mary of Guelders, provided financial aid in exchange for the much-disputed town and castle of Berwick upon Tweed. From the north, Margaret rallied troops in King Henry’s name and prepared to march south to free her husband.

Before the Lancastrians could head south, the Lord Protector came to them in West Yorkshire. On 30 December 1460 the armies clashed in the Battle of Wakefield, a significant victory for King Henry’s armies. More importantly, the Duke of York was slain, which would have been taken as a sign of God’s favour for the royalist cause.

No one is entirely certain how the duke was killed – in battle or by execution after capture. A popular and almost certainly mythical account was that Queen Margaret asked her son what should be done with the duke and his son, Edmund, Earl of Rutland, and it was at the behest of the bloodthirsty seven year old prince that the noble York and his young son were slaughtered. The more likely scenario is that the duke was killed in battle, and that Edmund of Rutland “attempted to escape over Wakefield Bridge, but was overtaken and killed, possibly by Lord Clifford in revenge for his father’s death at St Albans.” York’s ally, Richard Neville, Earl of Salisbury, and Salisbury’s second son, Sir Thomas Neville, were also killed in the fighting, and Salisbury’s son-in-law, William, Lord Harington, was executed afterwards.

'The_Murder_of_Rutland_by_Lord_Clifford'_by_Charles_Robert_Leslie,_1815

The queen reportedly demanded that the heads of York, Rutland and Salisbury be “displayed over Micklegate Bar, the south-western gate through the York city walls, the Duke wearing a paper crown and a sign saying “Let York overlook the town of York”.” However, it is unclear whether or not this was done upon the queen’s orders; the duke and his rebellion was very unpopular in the north and the Battle of St Albans had left him with many enemies who would have wanted to disgrace him. Even if the queen had done it … it would have been seen as a fitting punishment for treason.

That his father’s head had been stuck to a pike enraged York’s eldest son, Edward, Earl of March, who stormed into England like the wrath of the gods. Eventually he would displace King Henry at the Battle of Towton in March 1461, and would go on to slay Edward of Westminster. King Henry died ‘in his sleep’ while in captivity shortly after his son died in battle.  The only Lancasterian claimant left alive was a relative nobody — a young boy named Harry Tudor — that almost no one would support for the throne. The Earl of March was the clear victor, and had himself crowned as King Edward IV, one of the last Plantagenet rulers of Britain.

 

 

 

 

4 thoughts on “The Death of the 3rd Duke of York


  1. According to the books that I’ve read, it wasn’t only that York and the Beauforts disagreed over policy (such as France) but also thinks like Beaufort getting reimbursed for his expenses while in charge of France whereas York’s claim was never paid. Not sure how accurate this is … or how much really was attributable to Margaret of Anjou … but as best as I can tell, it wasn’t just the succession.


    1. I think that York was already getting much too big for his britches by the time Henry VI married, and he resented anything that didn’t single him out as the king’s pet (or even equal) as a “slight” and an excuse for umbrage.


  2. What an interesting read. I loved the „family tree“.
    But I dont like the way the duke of york is described in this text. It wasn‘t just that he wanted more power for himself and thats because he went after the crown.
    He also did a lot for his king and the country and didnt felt like it was recognised enough.
    Also the mental state of henry vi is not mentioned in the text which i think was also a major motivation for york to rebel.
    From any other texts i have read about the duke of york i always felt more sympathetic towards him.
    And as for queen margaret. She was quite a she-wolf. I dont really think she would have cared if she made an enemy in york. She was ruthless.
    It was just the way things worked back then. People rebelled and have overthrown their kings for less 😀


    1. The thing is … all of the “she-wolf” qualities of Margaret of Anjou are found in records written by the Yorks and pro-Yorkists after their victory. There is no evidence, except in hindsight as an excuse for York’s rebellion, that she treated the duke with anything other than courtesy. She did eventually get testy with the duke — but he was trying to wear the crown from the moment Henry VI became mentally ill and he was a clear and present danger to her son; what right-thinking queen wouldn’t try to curb his obvious ambition? As for his claims he was not after the throne — actions speak louder than words.

Comments are closed.